Totalitarian socialist establishment lies, chapter 742

The liberal establishment must be stopped at all costs. They are liars, cheaters and swindlers. And this is the latest example. Liberals in the media, like Chris Matthews and the despicable John Aravosis, have completely twisted something that Ann Coulter said to make it look like she wants John Edwards assassinated. Of course, that is NOT what she said. The little clip that these totalitarian liberals are playing of Coulter is a complete misrepresentation of what she said. Of course, they don't care what the truth is; they only care about control and spreading their hate-mongering. Thank God for people like Bill O'Reilly who talked to Coulter about what she said and played THE WHOLE CLIP for their audiences (above; her comment is at 2:45).

Thank you Ann for not comparing gays to John Edwards!!!

Edwards, Aravosis, Matthews, and the rest of the divisive totalitarian liberals who showed only a 10-second misrepresentation of Coulter in order to spread more hate and misunderstanding should be ashamed of themselves.

Yet another reason to be scared to death of the liberal establishment.

Comments

[Fran McCaffery]

Can one actually be 'scared to death'?

Both Ann Coulter and Bill Maher are extremists in order to sell a product. Defending either is unnecessary.

Also, do we really have to thank God for Bill O'Reilly? Nothing against Bill O'Reilly, but God created evolution, can't we start there? Is it possible that we thanked God for all other creations that we are now at Bill O'Reilly?

Nice site, but you don't really expect us to believe there is a conservative homosexual, God has not created such a beast.

[You]

So do you actually masturbate while writing this drivel? Because if being a huge asshole doesn't get your rocks off, it's pretty hard to comprehend.

Question: What would you do if your child told you he/she was gay?

Coulter: "I'd say, 'Did I ever tell you you're adopted?'"

Oh Ann! You're so precious!

[Landon Bryce]

It is not reasonable to defend Coulter without dealing with her many despicable statements. She has called for assassination in precisely the way Bill Mahar did in the incident she is claiming to parody. She routinely demeans and marginalizes gays. Do you really think the liberal divisives you deride can touch Coulter for nastiness and destructive commentary? Choose any of your regular targets (Rosie, Solemnese, Colbert, etc.) and find the most outrageous, destructive thing they ever said. Coulter has said something worse. She is the ultimate divisive. Again, do you not recognize this as hypocrisy? How?

[Brian]

Of course, people like Coulter and O'Reilly are never divisive or mean spirited in any way. Thanks for clearing that up!